% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 43020 % Primary Name: NOKOLSKI % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: AK % Latitude: 52.94100 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -168.87100 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 5.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 30 % % IDs: gsod - 998429-99999 % icao - OLSA2 % usaf - 998429 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 5f0da771f3568b35068dea69d2c9aefa % Raw Data Hash: 05c2fa66488dc25cd322f7b61e46dd53 % Adj Data Hash: f1dfc8a9ea71da8063f34b20db2dc644 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.041 -0.324 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.997 0.027 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.373 0.660 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.969 0.111 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.890 1.792 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.740 1.302 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.935 0.284 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.506 -1.735 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.340 0.153 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.415 0.225 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.551 -0.125 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.968 -0.317 2010 8 9.064 -0.374 1 0 NaN NaN 10.620 0.255 2010 9 9.193 1.150 0 0 9.193 1.150 10.432 1.462 2010 10 5.419 0.634 0 0 5.419 0.634 6.080 0.367 2010 11 3.969 1.037 0 0 3.969 1.037 5.171 1.313 2010 12 2.403 1.233 0 0 2.403 1.233 3.138 1.040 2011 1 1.876 1.366 0 0 1.876 1.366 3.107 1.669 2011 2 2.481 2.756 1 0 NaN NaN 2.979 2.328 2011 3 1.640 1.338 0 0 1.640 1.338 2.430 1.202 2011 4 2.150 0.890 0 0 2.150 0.890 2.565 0.378 2011 5 4.477 1.214 0 0 4.477 1.214 5.126 0.937 2011 6 5.987 0.238 0 0 5.987 0.238 6.701 0.024 2011 7 7.685 -0.674 1 0 NaN NaN 9.300 0.015 2011 8 9.520 0.082 0 0 9.520 0.082 10.887 0.522 2011 9 7.455 -0.589 1 0 NaN NaN 9.099 0.129 2011 10 6.434 1.648 0 0 6.434 1.648 7.032 1.319 2011 11 4.076 1.145 0 0 4.076 1.145 5.169 1.311 2011 12 1.532 0.362 0 0 1.532 0.362 2.602 0.505 2012 1 -1.507 -2.018 0 0 -1.507 -2.018 -0.154 -1.591 2012 2 0.651 0.927 0 0 0.651 0.927 1.432 0.781 2012 3 -0.367 -0.668 0 0 -0.367 -0.668 -0.079 -1.308 2012 4 1.519 0.258 0 0 1.519 0.258 1.927 -0.260 2012 5 3.038 -0.225 0 0 3.038 -0.225 3.610 -0.580 2012 6 5.913 0.164 0 0 5.913 0.164 6.381 -0.295 2012 7 7.291 -1.067 1 0 NaN NaN 8.834 -0.451 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.714 0.349 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.647 -0.323 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.564 0.852 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.358 0.500 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.012 0.915 2013 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.044 1.607 2013 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.506 -0.145 2013 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.229 1.000 2013 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.449 0.262 2013 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.035 -0.155 2013 6 6.905 1.156 1 0 NaN NaN 7.478 0.802 2013 7 9.348 0.989 0 2 9.348 0.989 10.438 1.153 2013 8 9.665 0.227 0 0 9.665 0.227 11.740 1.375 2013 9 8.624 0.581 0 0 8.624 0.581 10.124 1.154 2013 10 6.464 1.678 0 0 6.464 1.678 7.483 1.770 2013 11 5.879 2.948 1 0 NaN NaN NaN NaN