% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 39695 % Primary Name: CENTERVILLE ARBAUGH RANCH % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: ID % Latitude: 43.95920 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -115.84530 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 1353.30 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 19 % % Alternate Names: CENTERVILLE ARBAUGH RC % % IDs: coop - 101636 % ghcnd - USC00101636 % ncdc - 20005282 % nws - CVAI1 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 4e78a5bbddc01ce6c931e3e7df51b66f % Raw Data Hash: c83079ba2a337120b24f73501c9a073d % Adj Data Hash: 7dbf0d38dfc7914cbfdc9cddc403ed6f % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.609 -3.135 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.306 -1.743 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.154 -0.274 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.622 -0.664 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.297 0.728 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.061 2.761 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.092 -0.628 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.728 1.207 2011 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.088 0.984 2011 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.165 -0.362 2011 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.922 -0.284 2011 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.646 -3.034 2011 5 8.111 -1.672 0 0 8.111 -1.672 8.780 -1.965 2011 6 12.444 -1.644 0 0 12.444 -1.644 12.412 -2.638 2011 7 17.333 -1.133 0 0 17.333 -1.133 18.968 -0.460 2011 8 17.944 0.620 0 0 17.944 0.620 19.956 1.670 2011 9 14.333 1.726 0 0 14.333 1.726 16.573 3.005 2011 10 7.167 0.828 0 0 7.167 0.828 8.358 1.058 2011 11 -0.944 -0.520 0 0 -0.944 -0.520 -0.421 -0.957 2011 12 -3.784 1.113 0 0 -3.784 1.113 -3.298 0.638 2012 1 -4.209 1.824 1 0 NaN NaN -2.443 2.629 2012 2 -2.721 0.044 1 0 NaN NaN -0.861 0.943 2012 3 1.966 1.721 0 0 1.966 1.721 1.978 0.772 2012 4 7.335 2.616 0 0 7.335 2.616 6.884 1.204 2012 5 9.626 -0.157 0 0 9.626 -0.157 10.333 -0.411 2012 6 13.742 -0.346 1 0 NaN NaN 13.725 -1.324 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.931 2.504 2012 8 18.512 1.188 0 0 18.512 1.188 20.397 2.111 2012 9 13.809 1.201 0 0 13.809 1.201 15.429 1.860 2012 10 6.343 0.005 1 0 NaN NaN 7.201 -0.099 2012 11 8.020 8.445 1 0 NaN NaN 2.289 1.752 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.384 1.551 2013 1 -7.371 -1.338 1 0 NaN NaN -6.815 -1.742 2013 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.986 0.817 2013 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.882 0.675 2013 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.203 -0.477 2013 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.867 1.123 2013 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.495 0.445 2013 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.523 3.096 2013 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.575 2.289 2013 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.346 0.777 2013 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.806 -0.494