% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 39071 % Primary Name: WEBSTER % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: NH % Latitude: 43.30000 +/- 0.00833 % Longitude: -71.70000 +/- 0.00833 % Elevation (m): 137.20 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 26 % % IDs: coop - 279045 % ghcnd - USC00279045 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % % Site Hash: b166252bb12124450c111a505fb37560 % Raw Data Hash: b1fa9d46c129e8fc2e8868431635e598 % Adj Data Hash: c745b00677fb07650556af393bd72cc7 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 1991 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.464 0.875 1992 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.480 1.265 1992 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.539 1.128 1992 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.581 -1.164 1992 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.003 -1.003 1992 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.859 -0.374 1992 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.508 -0.787 1992 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.096 -1.892 1992 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.902 -0.927 1992 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.224 -0.208 1992 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.453 -1.944 1992 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.183 -0.486 1992 12 -2.944 0.936 0 0 -2.944 0.936 -2.938 0.401 1993 1 -4.889 1.398 0 0 -4.889 1.398 -3.731 2.014 1993 2 -9.444 -4.236 0 0 -9.444 -4.236 -8.040 -3.373 1993 3 -1.222 -1.263 0 0 -1.222 -1.263 -0.750 -1.333 1993 4 7.000 0.536 0 0 7.000 0.536 7.581 0.576 1993 5 13.167 0.475 0 0 13.167 0.475 14.205 0.972 1993 6 17.444 -0.309 0 0 17.444 -0.309 18.014 -0.281 1993 7 21.111 0.666 0 0 21.111 0.666 21.431 0.444 1993 8 20.389 1.102 0 0 20.389 1.102 20.809 0.980 1993 9 14.667 -0.223 0 0 14.667 -0.223 15.240 -0.192 1993 10 7.500 -1.356 0 0 7.500 -1.356 7.973 -1.425 1993 11 2.944 -0.182 0 0 2.944 -0.182 4.170 0.501 1993 12 -2.222 1.659 0 0 -2.222 1.659 -3.037 0.302 1994 1 -11.611 -5.324 0 0 -11.611 -5.324 -10.163 -4.418 1994 2 -7.741 -2.532 1 0 NaN NaN -7.270 -2.603 1994 3 1.290 1.249 1 0 NaN NaN 0.428 -0.155 1994 4 7.167 0.703 0 0 7.167 0.703 8.181 1.175 1994 5 11.667 -1.025 0 0 11.667 -1.025 12.445 -0.788 1994 6 20.222 2.469 0 0 20.222 2.469 19.750 1.455 1994 7 22.333 1.888 0 0 22.333 1.888 22.961 1.973 1994 8 18.833 -0.454 0 0 18.833 -0.454 19.225 -0.604 1994 9 14.278 -0.612 0 0 14.278 -0.612 14.772 -0.659 1994 10 9.722 0.867 0 0 9.722 0.867 9.391 -0.007 1994 11 3.405 0.278 1 0 NaN NaN 6.428 2.759 1994 12 -1.346 2.535 1 0 NaN NaN -0.896 2.443 1995 1 -3.281 3.006 1 0 NaN NaN -1.836 3.908 1995 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.749 -1.082 1995 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.510 1.927 1995 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.869 -1.136 1995 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.384 -0.849 1995 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.792 0.497 1995 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.460 1.472 1995 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.131 0.302 1995 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.381 -1.050 1995 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.250 1.853 1995 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.432 -1.237 1995 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.502 -2.163 1996 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.624 0.121