% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 37606 % Primary Name: SCOTTSBLUFF 10 N % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: NE % Latitude: 42.03080 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -103.70220 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 1294.49 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 16 % % Alternate Names: Missing Station ID - 257668 % % IDs: coop - 257668 % ghcnd - USC00257668 % ncdc - 30001387 % nws - DFYN1 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: f726b93f041181a8498643833606dee6 % Raw Data Hash: 5b4eb2c25784350d57a2230d08d73a2b % Adj Data Hash: e303a3347caf3ed3b4e4f29b9c447a71 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2001 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.224 2.459 2001 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.148 1.049 2002 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.209 1.980 2002 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.069 1.210 2002 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.541 -3.914 2002 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.790 0.914 2002 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.732 -1.021 2002 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.474 2.154 2002 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.732 2.366 2002 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.666 -0.472 2002 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.941 0.355 2002 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.212 -3.092 2002 11 -0.212 -1.212 1 0 NaN NaN 1.083 0.318 2002 12 -0.667 2.296 0 0 -0.667 2.296 -0.447 2.751 2003 1 -1.056 3.898 0 0 -1.056 3.898 -0.456 4.733 2003 2 -4.222 -2.178 0 0 -4.222 -2.178 -3.669 -1.390 2003 3 2.111 1.504 0 0 2.111 1.504 1.369 0.997 2003 4 9.111 3.001 0 0 9.111 3.001 8.137 2.262 2003 5 13.000 1.012 0 0 13.000 1.012 12.261 0.508 2003 6 17.000 -0.554 0 0 17.000 -0.554 15.332 -1.987 2003 7 24.778 3.178 0 0 24.778 3.178 24.063 2.698 2003 8 23.278 2.905 0 0 23.278 2.905 22.494 2.356 2003 9 14.278 -0.543 0 0 14.278 -0.543 13.245 -1.341 2003 10 10.278 1.739 0 0 10.278 1.739 11.078 2.774 2003 11 -0.278 -1.277 0 0 -0.278 -1.277 -1.168 -1.933 2003 12 -1.833 1.129 0 0 -1.833 1.129 -1.062 2.136 2004 1 -3.000 1.954 0 0 -3.000 1.954 -2.728 2.461 2004 2 -1.667 0.378 0 0 -1.667 0.378 -0.859 1.421 2004 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.148 3.776 2004 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.571 1.696 2004 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.714 0.961 2004 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.720 -1.599 2004 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.726 -0.640 2004 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.426 -1.712 2004 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.000 0.413 2004 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.559 1.255 2004 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.278 0.513 2004 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.840 2.357 2005 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.523 2.665 2005 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.160 3.440