% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 36330 % Primary Name: DANVILLE % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: PA % Latitude: 40.95920 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -76.61750 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 145.30 +/- 0.55 % # of Months: 12 % % IDs: coop - 362013 % ghcnd - USC00362013 % ncdc - 20016938 % nws - DANP1 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: f90d9f56beccb8665b5db741d734a525 % Raw Data Hash: 7d3747462adb675854c4fbab225446e0 % Adj Data Hash: 81304d5d39dd7fdde43c8b152a8a5e38 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.177 0.974 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.974 -0.198 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.836 -0.871 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.139 3.248 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.355 -0.053 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.888 0.800 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.888 -0.292 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.693 4.047 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.412 3.251 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.423 1.627 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.446 1.791 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.956 1.878 2010 8 21.242 -0.470 1 0 NaN NaN 22.236 1.034 2010 9 18.400 0.718 0 0 18.400 0.718 18.498 1.325 2010 10 12.167 0.950 1 0 NaN NaN 11.229 0.522 2010 11 5.472 0.071 0 0 5.472 0.071 5.857 0.965 2010 12 -1.531 -0.738 0 0 -1.531 -0.738 -2.928 -1.626 2011 1 -4.127 -0.949 0 0 -4.127 -0.949 -5.025 -1.337 2011 2 -1.975 0.111 1 0 NaN NaN -2.276 0.319 2011 3 3.534 0.378 0 0 3.534 0.378 2.973 0.327 2011 4 10.765 1.095 0 0 10.765 1.095 10.595 1.434 2011 5 17.473 2.168 0 0 17.473 2.168 16.672 1.877 2011 6 21.572 1.407 0 0 21.572 1.407 20.841 1.186 2011 7 23.162 0.574 1 0 NaN NaN 24.407 2.328 2011 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.522 0.319 2011 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.854 1.681 2011 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.926 0.219 2011 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.973 3.082 2011 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.927 3.228 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.939 2.749 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.018 3.613 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.124 6.477 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.777 0.616 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.918 3.122 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.792 0.137 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.305 2.226