% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 36110 % Primary Name: SPRING CREEK % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: NV % Latitude: 40.79420 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -115.66190 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 1635.86 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 16 % % Alternate Names: Missing Station ID - 267740 % % IDs: coop - 267740 % ghcnd - USC00267740 % ncdc - 30015528 % nws - SCFN2 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 003e3dd0c77f115a0399bc56f0f5fd63 % Raw Data Hash: 4fa3f641ce0a11ea29e58cd3fbc5b36f % Adj Data Hash: 2753d350b835fa9819b5728e9106b9d6 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.768 -1.644 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.456 0.719 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -7.525 -3.612 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.814 1.867 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.878 1.049 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.708 -0.063 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.792 -1.273 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.654 -3.665 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.338 -0.801 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.315 0.229 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.114 -0.616 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.633 0.939 2010 10 8.944 1.424 0 0 8.944 1.424 9.453 2.041 2010 11 -0.778 -1.624 0 0 -0.778 -1.624 -0.401 -1.138 2010 12 -1.556 2.249 0 0 -1.556 2.249 -2.055 1.858 2011 1 -3.667 0.906 0 0 -3.667 0.906 -3.464 1.217 2011 2 -0.944 0.874 0 0 -0.944 0.874 -1.724 0.203 2011 3 3.222 2.342 0 0 3.222 2.342 1.338 0.567 2011 4 4.722 -0.451 0 0 4.722 -0.451 2.903 -2.162 2011 5 7.833 -2.595 0 0 7.833 -2.595 7.635 -2.684 2011 6 13.278 -1.970 0 0 13.278 -1.970 12.892 -2.247 2011 7 19.667 -0.528 0 0 19.667 -0.528 20.169 0.084 2011 8 19.611 0.772 0 0 19.611 0.772 19.968 1.238 2011 9 15.000 1.197 0 0 15.000 1.197 15.778 2.084 2011 10 7.833 0.313 0 0 7.833 0.313 8.826 1.414 2011 11 0.333 -0.513 0 0 0.333 -0.513 0.031 -0.706 2011 12 -4.427 -0.623 0 0 -4.427 -0.623 -3.910 0.004 2012 1 -2.246 2.327 1 0 NaN NaN -1.620 3.061 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.399 0.528 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.719 1.948 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.023 1.959 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.167 0.847 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.381 0.243 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.573 1.488 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.605 1.875 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.663 1.968 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.807 1.395 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.225 2.488 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.795 0.118 2013 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -7.257 -2.575