% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 35707 % Primary Name: HEBER CITY MUNI MCDO % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: UT % Latitude: 40.48200 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -111.42900 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 1718.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 11 % % IDs: gsod - 720565-99999 % icao - K36U % usaf - 720565 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 614cac85337c461b8974e78ab6ad8401 % Raw Data Hash: 766b8fef85a5a3220a790801e7a738ec % Adj Data Hash: 1cdbe1be6bdd0d893f393a8127ec627b % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.224 -0.218 2009 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.094 1.035 2009 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.779 -1.868 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.169 0.310 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.004 -0.704 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.097 1.853 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.489 -1.901 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.219 1.862 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -8.957 -2.826 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.836 2.492 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.472 -0.020 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.685 0.807 2010 4 7.312 3.284 1 0 NaN NaN 1.861 -0.582 2010 5 7.615 -2.030 0 0 7.615 -2.030 5.044 -3.015 2010 6 15.648 1.415 0 0 15.648 1.415 12.251 -0.396 2010 7 20.201 1.757 0 0 20.201 1.757 17.453 0.595 2010 8 18.851 1.557 0 0 18.851 1.557 15.518 -0.191 2010 9 13.783 0.954 0 0 13.783 0.954 12.689 1.445 2010 10 7.667 0.691 0 0 7.667 0.691 7.257 1.867 2010 11 -0.870 -0.813 0 0 -0.870 -0.813 -2.443 -0.800 2010 12 -2.119 2.428 0 0 -2.119 2.428 -4.068 2.064 2011 1 -9.256 -3.513 0 0 -9.256 -3.513 -6.451 0.878 2011 2 -5.175 -1.308 1 0 NaN NaN -6.570 -1.118 2011 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.030 0.463 2011 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.600 -1.842 2011 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.437 -2.622 2011 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.181 -1.467 2011 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.201 0.342 2011 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.149 1.441 2011 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.472 1.227 2011 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.467 1.077 2011 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.227 -0.583 2011 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -6.214 -0.083 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.058 3.270 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.047 0.405