% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 35135 % Primary Name: CISCO % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: IL % Latitude: 40.00830 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -88.72670 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 209.70 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 19 % % Alternate Names: CISCO 2 NW % Missing Station ID - 111655 % % IDs: coop - 111655 % ghcnd - USC00111655 % ncdc - 30000945 % nws - CISI2 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 16610146b10edfc0c3bfab38ac8d1dc3 % Raw Data Hash: d5027d09808c37279bfadeb38b04ddad % Adj Data Hash: fc188bdd87117427bf367a54eda8b02a % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 1999 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.698 3.988 1999 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.210 -1.013 1999 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.891 1.499 1999 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.640 0.699 1999 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.559 0.585 1999 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.758 1.767 1999 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.221 -0.653 1999 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.093 -0.078 1999 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.137 0.575 1999 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.696 4.488 1999 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.980 1.886 2000 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.139 0.934 2000 2 2.278 3.761 0 0 2.278 3.761 4.125 4.415 2000 3 7.389 3.359 0 0 7.389 3.359 8.176 2.953 2000 4 10.778 -0.420 0 0 10.778 -0.420 12.412 0.020 2000 5 18.500 1.753 0 0 18.500 1.753 19.407 1.467 2000 6 22.000 0.221 0 0 22.000 0.221 22.607 -0.366 2000 7 23.278 -0.520 0 0 23.278 -0.520 24.000 -0.992 2000 8 23.000 0.320 0 0 23.000 0.320 24.725 0.852 2000 9 18.556 -0.422 0 0 18.556 -0.422 20.389 0.218 2000 10 13.833 1.466 0 0 13.833 1.466 15.751 2.189 2000 11 3.667 -1.346 0 0 3.667 -1.346 5.018 -1.189 2000 12 -7.778 -6.678 0 0 -7.778 -6.678 -6.571 -6.665 2001 1 -3.389 0.878 0 0 -3.389 0.878 -3.209 -0.136 2001 2 -0.667 0.817 0 0 -0.667 0.817 0.588 0.877 2001 3 2.556 -1.474 0 0 2.556 -1.474 3.546 -1.678 2001 4 14.167 2.969 0 0 14.167 2.969 16.089 3.697 2001 5 18.722 1.976 0 0 18.722 1.976 19.149 1.208 2001 6 21.056 -0.724 0 0 21.056 -0.724 22.270 -0.703 2001 7 24.389 0.592 0 0 24.389 0.592 25.355 0.364 2001 8 25.467 2.787 1 0 NaN NaN 24.598 0.724 2001 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.651 -0.520 2001 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.523 -0.039 2001 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.123 4.916 2001 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.354 3.259 2002 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.116 4.189 2002 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.131 2.421 2002 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.811 -1.413 2002 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.795 1.403 2002 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.201 -1.740 2002 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.761 1.788 2002 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.683 1.691 2002 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.900 1.026