% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 33402 % Primary Name: CASTLETON % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: VA % Latitude: 38.60470 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -78.11000 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 164.90 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 23 % % Alternate Names: Missing Station ID - 441434 % % IDs: coop - 441434 % ghcnd - USC00441434 % ncdc - 30015367 % nws - CTNV2 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: deb42910bc5a464ad4966a447c199f92 % Raw Data Hash: 8be4e47beff23f9a3ce01b6656950527 % Adj Data Hash: af6e23033281fc5c8357e847521960a0 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.913 -0.199 2009 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.963 1.161 2009 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.238 0.542 2009 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.300 0.372 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.291 -0.981 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.046 1.383 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.752 -0.273 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.108 -0.290 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.323 2.367 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.000 -0.733 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.278 -0.743 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.551 -2.778 2010 3 8.778 2.391 0 0 8.790 2.403 10.210 2.098 2010 4 14.667 2.589 0 0 14.678 2.601 16.471 2.669 2010 5 18.333 1.361 0 0 18.345 1.373 20.338 1.642 2010 6 23.944 2.741 0 0 23.956 2.753 26.055 3.127 2010 7 25.333 1.786 0 0 25.345 1.798 27.397 2.125 2010 8 23.889 0.950 0 0 23.901 0.962 26.076 1.413 2010 9 20.722 1.421 0 0 20.734 1.433 23.316 2.291 2010 10 14.333 1.659 0 0 14.345 1.671 15.463 1.065 2010 11 7.556 0.324 0 0 7.567 0.336 9.589 0.633 2010 12 -0.556 -2.565 0 0 -0.544 -2.553 0.109 -3.624 2011 1 -0.778 -1.075 0 0 -0.766 -1.063 0.559 -1.462 2011 2 3.500 1.895 0 0 3.512 1.907 5.390 2.061 2011 3 7.167 0.780 0 0 7.178 0.792 8.813 0.702 2011 4 14.000 1.922 0 0 14.012 1.934 16.387 2.585 2011 5 18.500 1.528 0 1 18.476 1.504 19.810 1.114 2011 6 23.111 1.907 0 0 23.087 1.884 24.521 1.593 2011 7 25.667 2.119 0 0 25.643 2.096 27.080 1.809 2011 8 24.278 1.339 0 0 24.254 1.316 25.429 0.766 2011 9 20.111 0.810 0 0 20.087 0.786 22.157 1.132 2011 10 12.611 -0.063 0 0 12.587 -0.086 14.221 -0.177 2011 11 9.500 2.269 0 0 9.476 2.245 11.484 2.529 2011 12 5.538 3.529 1 0 NaN NaN 6.920 3.187 2012 1 6.350 6.053 1 0 NaN NaN 4.768 2.747 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.863 2.534 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.946 5.835 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.552 0.751 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.726 2.030 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.740 -0.187 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.631 2.359 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.276 0.614 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.158 0.133 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.819 0.421 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.458 -1.498 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.864 3.131 2013 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.060 2.039