% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 33071 % Primary Name: CHEASAPEAKE BIO LAB % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: VA % Latitude: 38.31700 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -76.45000 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 10.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 21 % % IDs: gsod - 997298-99999 % icao - CBIM2 % usaf - 997298 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: e143777ff31b0d673bff0ea20b71945f % Raw Data Hash: ac24cf337de38c94cc767c080d60b30e % Adj Data Hash: 7e2bfc173d7c7679f7b14e53e5c9ffa3 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2006 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.557 0.228 2006 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.984 0.873 2006 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.709 1.908 2006 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.930 -0.766 2006 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.012 0.084 2006 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.305 1.034 2006 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.539 1.877 2006 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.140 -0.885 2006 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.599 -0.799 2006 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.962 2.006 2006 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.051 3.318 2007 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.447 3.426 2007 2 0.468 -3.245 1 0 NaN NaN 0.261 -3.068 2007 3 8.861 0.367 0 0 8.861 0.367 10.140 2.029 2007 4 12.418 -1.767 1 0 NaN NaN 13.449 -0.353 2007 5 19.211 0.132 0 0 19.211 0.132 19.052 0.356 2007 6 24.057 0.746 0 0 24.057 0.746 23.555 0.627 2007 7 25.978 0.323 0 0 25.978 0.323 25.219 -0.052 2007 8 26.695 1.649 0 0 26.695 1.649 26.385 1.723 2007 9 23.430 2.020 0 0 23.430 2.020 22.404 1.378 2007 10 20.195 5.414 0 0 20.195 5.414 18.280 3.882 2007 11 10.585 1.246 0 0 10.585 1.246 9.699 0.743 2007 12 5.731 1.614 0 0 5.731 1.614 5.490 1.756 2008 1 4.400 1.995 0 0 4.400 1.995 3.427 1.406 2008 2 4.954 1.241 0 0 4.954 1.241 4.986 1.657 2008 3 9.069 0.574 0 0 9.069 0.574 9.815 1.703 2008 4 13.488 -0.697 1 0 NaN NaN 14.964 1.162 2008 5 17.998 -1.082 0 0 17.998 -1.082 17.728 -0.968 2008 6 24.354 1.042 1 0 NaN NaN 25.001 2.073 2008 7 26.502 0.847 1 0 NaN NaN 25.636 0.364 2008 8 25.639 0.593 1 0 NaN NaN 24.395 -0.267 2008 9 23.371 1.962 1 0 NaN NaN 21.974 0.949 2008 10 18.574 3.792 1 0 NaN NaN 13.677 -0.721 2008 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.596 -0.360 2008 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.487 1.754 2009 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.639 -1.382 2009 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.435 1.106 2009 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.913 -0.199 2009 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.963 1.161 2009 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.238 0.542 2009 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.300 0.372 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.291 -0.981 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.046 1.383 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.752 -0.273 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.108 -0.290