% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 32881 % Primary Name: LOUISA 5 W % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: KY % Latitude: 38.12530 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -82.69360 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 229.50 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 36 % % IDs: coop - 154948 % ghcnd - USC00154948 % ncdc - 30000175 % nws - LSIK2 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: c07483c765e02eb44de17e4d41facf09 % Raw Data Hash: 05f1e651d18757b4995084cd7bec484e % Adj Data Hash: 392c0b9204a59729dde7c705e41644f4 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.208 -0.185 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.986 0.956 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.165 -1.051 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.693 2.459 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.101 -0.298 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.527 -1.837 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.565 -3.504 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.915 0.872 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.546 2.718 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.548 1.814 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.740 2.930 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.382 1.481 2010 8 24.889 1.788 0 0 24.889 1.788 25.312 1.920 2010 9 21.111 1.372 0 0 21.111 1.372 21.434 1.404 2010 10 14.389 1.464 0 0 14.389 1.464 14.337 1.121 2010 11 8.944 2.002 0 0 8.944 2.002 8.726 1.492 2010 12 -3.651 -5.757 1 0 NaN NaN -2.008 -4.406 2011 1 -1.008 -1.027 1 0 NaN NaN -1.427 -1.738 2011 2 2.950 1.302 1 0 NaN NaN 3.465 1.525 2011 3 8.235 1.484 1 0 NaN NaN 8.567 1.524 2011 4 14.611 2.075 0 0 14.611 2.075 15.054 2.226 2011 5 17.667 0.224 0 0 17.667 0.224 17.878 0.144 2011 6 22.833 1.315 0 0 22.833 1.315 23.074 1.264 2011 7 25.444 1.836 0 0 25.444 1.836 25.943 2.043 2011 8 24.056 0.955 0 0 24.056 0.955 24.019 0.626 2011 9 17.421 -2.317 1 0 NaN NaN 20.098 0.067 2011 10 13.298 0.373 1 0 NaN NaN 12.781 -0.435 2011 11 9.000 2.058 0 0 9.000 2.058 10.255 3.020 2011 12 5.828 3.721 1 0 NaN NaN 5.303 2.905 2012 1 3.168 3.149 1 0 NaN NaN 2.992 2.682 2012 2 5.038 3.390 1 0 NaN NaN 4.027 2.087 2012 3 13.524 6.773 1 0 NaN NaN 13.968 6.925 2012 4 13.145 0.609 1 0 NaN NaN 13.649 0.821 2012 5 20.544 3.102 0 1 20.544 3.102 20.468 2.734 2012 6 21.945 0.427 1 0 NaN NaN 22.236 0.426 2012 7 25.976 2.367 1 0 NaN NaN 26.258 2.357 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.451 0.059 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.045 0.015 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.836 -0.381 2012 11 5.928 -1.014 1 0 NaN NaN 6.493 -0.741 2012 12 5.132 3.026 1 0 NaN NaN 6.103 3.705 2013 1 2.761 2.742 1 0 NaN NaN 2.161 1.850 2013 2 2.797 1.149 1 0 NaN NaN 1.694 -0.245 2013 3 3.681 -3.070 1 0 NaN NaN 3.953 -3.090 2013 4 14.337 1.801 1 0 NaN NaN 13.428 0.600 2013 5 17.944 0.502 0 0 17.944 0.502 18.092 0.358 2013 6 23.043 1.525 1 0 NaN NaN 22.748 0.938 2013 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.816 -0.085 2013 8 22.556 -0.545 0 0 22.556 -0.545 22.960 -0.433 2013 9 20.087 0.348 0 0 20.087 0.348 20.608 0.577 2013 10 13.224 0.299 1 0 NaN NaN 14.166 0.949 2013 11 11.875 4.933 1 0 NaN NaN NaN NaN