% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 30120 % Primary Name: CLINTON SHERMAN AP % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: OK % Latitude: 35.21000 +/- 0.00014 % Longitude: -99.12000 +/- 0.00014 % Elevation (m): 585.83 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 15 % % Alternate Names: CLINTON NAS % CLINTON SHERMAN AFB % Missing Station ID - 341906 % % IDs: coop - 341906 % faa - CLK % faa - CSM % icao - KCLK % icao - KCSM % ncdc - 20014745 % nws - CSM % wban - 13999 % wban - 3932 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 2d8034c00d6602ef66f040c54eac882c % Raw Data Hash: b4e1473f2b56411aaa7858f84f0d05ef % Adj Data Hash: b4e1473f2b56411aaa7858f84f0d05ef % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.794 -1.120 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.272 -3.287 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.597 2.356 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.844 -2.663 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.987 -0.603 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.279 -3.183 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.096 -0.823 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.124 0.299 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.215 -0.362 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.212 2.573 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.367 -0.747 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 30.153 1.808 2010 9 25.333 2.702 0 0 25.333 2.702 25.290 1.375 2010 10 18.278 2.001 0 0 18.278 2.001 18.692 1.132 2010 11 9.722 0.764 0 0 9.722 0.764 11.086 0.845 2010 12 4.500 0.276 0 0 4.500 0.276 6.194 0.687 2011 1 2.111 -0.196 0 0 2.111 -0.196 2.822 -0.768 2011 2 4.111 -1.069 0 0 4.111 -1.069 5.750 -0.713 2011 3 11.056 1.419 0 0 11.056 1.419 12.579 1.660 2011 4 17.056 1.513 0 0 17.056 1.513 19.404 2.579 2011 5 21.222 0.928 0 0 21.222 0.928 22.524 0.947 2011 6 30.333 4.977 0 0 30.333 4.977 31.962 5.323 2011 7 32.778 4.946 0 0 32.778 4.946 33.773 4.659 2011 8 31.778 4.716 0 0 31.778 4.716 33.543 5.199 2011 9 22.611 -0.021 0 0 22.611 -0.021 23.911 -0.003 2011 10 16.944 0.668 0 0 16.944 0.668 18.246 0.687 2011 11 9.444 0.486 0 0 9.444 0.486 10.742 0.501 2011 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.313 -0.194 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.698 3.108 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.253 0.790 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.237 4.318 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.805 2.980 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.261 2.684 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.256 1.617 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 31.221 2.107 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.367 1.023 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.692 0.778 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.058 -0.502 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.049 2.808