% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 29790 % Primary Name: BLAIRSVILLE % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % Latitude: 34.85000 +/- 0.00500 % Longitude: -84.00000 +/- 0.00500 % Elevation (m): 582.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 19 % % IDs: gsod - 720409-99999 % icao - K46A % usaf - 720409 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 1b42e9dbbffb54c1f84b17fd0cb3e6a5 % Raw Data Hash: ab5eb66dfa6c55cf6a67fd27db3a7a7c % Adj Data Hash: e91871c7a97792a2d437dc8a6ad2d22c % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2006 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.199 2.803 2007 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.838 1.718 2007 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.228 -1.402 2007 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.351 3.591 2007 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.006 -0.815 2007 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.540 0.511 2007 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.826 1.238 2007 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.678 -0.703 2007 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.399 3.315 2007 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.066 2.053 2007 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.174 2.354 2007 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.057 0.449 2007 12 10.083 6.051 1 0 NaN NaN 8.515 3.119 2008 1 2.612 -0.144 1 0 NaN NaN 3.553 -0.568 2008 2 7.413 3.147 0 0 7.413 3.147 6.762 1.131 2008 3 8.701 0.305 0 0 8.701 0.305 9.922 0.162 2008 4 14.061 0.604 0 0 14.061 0.604 15.061 0.240 2008 5 17.491 -0.173 0 0 17.491 -0.173 18.640 -0.389 2008 6 22.006 0.782 0 0 22.006 0.782 24.351 1.763 2008 7 22.367 -0.649 0 0 22.367 -0.649 24.554 0.174 2008 8 22.657 -0.062 1 0 NaN NaN 24.526 0.443 2008 9 20.109 0.460 0 0 20.109 0.460 21.965 0.952 2008 10 12.801 -0.655 0 0 12.801 -0.655 14.437 -0.383 2008 11 6.298 -1.946 0 0 6.298 -1.946 8.663 -0.945 2008 12 7.022 2.990 0 0 7.022 2.990 7.402 2.005 2009 1 2.975 0.218 0 0 2.975 0.218 3.959 -0.162 2009 2 5.055 0.788 1 0 NaN NaN 5.626 -0.005 2009 3 9.550 1.154 0 0 9.550 1.154 10.492 0.731 2009 4 13.372 -0.084 0 0 13.372 -0.084 14.560 -0.261 2009 5 18.118 0.454 0 0 18.118 0.454 19.493 0.465 2009 6 21.925 0.701 0 0 21.925 0.701 24.413 1.825 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.574 -0.806 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.414 0.330 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.473 0.460 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.157 -0.663 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.740 2.132 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.413 -0.983 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.941 -2.180 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.033 -3.597 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.647 -1.114 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.709 1.888 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.676 1.647 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.404 2.816