% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 2864 % Primary Name: PATRIOT HILLS AWS % Record Type: TAVG % Country: Antarctica % Latitude: -80.30000 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -81.33300 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 905.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 11 % % IDs: gsod - 890810-99999 % usaf - 890810 % wmo - 89081 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % World Meteorological Organization Metadata % % Site Hash: 55c7ea937169132228705a1d885760b0 % Raw Data Hash: 5ecba2ca0a3df01843d3892551acf81d % Adj Data Hash: fde1d00aff9fe048338d14a82764473d % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2007 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -28.307 1.715 2007 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -25.250 -2.139 2007 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -14.189 -0.757 2007 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.967 -0.142 2008 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -6.531 -0.585 2008 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -14.660 -0.329 2008 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -23.148 0.501 2008 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -24.771 2.534 2008 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -26.573 2.062 2008 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -29.443 1.278 2008 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -29.265 2.725 2008 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -31.595 0.255 2008 9 -28.480 3.404 1 0 NaN NaN -24.225 5.797 2008 10 -22.326 2.646 0 0 -22.326 2.646 -22.311 0.800 2008 11 -16.431 -1.139 0 0 -16.431 -1.139 -13.922 -0.491 2008 12 -10.385 -2.699 0 0 -10.385 -2.699 -6.932 -1.107 2009 1 -9.885 -2.077 1 0 NaN NaN -6.077 -0.131 2009 2 -16.820 -0.628 1 0 NaN NaN -15.358 -1.028 2009 3 -21.443 4.068 0 0 -21.443 4.068 -22.103 1.547 2009 4 -28.546 0.621 1 0 NaN NaN -27.449 -0.145 2009 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -25.706 2.929 2009 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -31.674 -0.953 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -32.065 -0.076 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -30.708 1.142 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -29.175 0.847 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -23.411 -0.300 2009 11 -12.416 2.876 1 0 NaN NaN -12.265 1.166 2009 12 -9.846 -2.160 0 0 -9.846 -2.160 -5.856 -0.032 2010 1 -7.518 0.290 1 0 NaN NaN -5.264 0.683 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -12.320 2.011 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -23.589 0.061 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -27.852 -0.548 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -28.668 -0.033 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -27.668 3.053 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -32.065 -0.075 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -28.496 3.354 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -27.545 2.478 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -20.753 2.358 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -13.202 0.229 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.694 0.131 2011 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -6.894 -0.948