% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 28092 % Primary Name: MERIDAN JOE WILLIAMS NOLF % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: MS % Latitude: 32.80000 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -88.83330 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 164.59 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 17 % % IDs: faa - NJW % ghcnd - USW00053849 % icao - KNJW % ncdc - 30014225 % nws - NJW % wban - 53849 % % Sources: Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 560317eb8effab74df85bd4813b7afc8 % Raw Data Hash: 3064f90992e76e1d0998afe249cced09 % Adj Data Hash: aed57fbe07274b04e147caa678cf1bcc % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 1995 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.909 0.790 1995 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.550 1.842 1995 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.995 0.105 1995 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.263 -0.148 1995 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.232 -1.711 1995 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.562 -0.505 1996 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.212 -0.380 1996 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.399 -0.228 1996 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.547 -2.189 1996 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.329 -1.268 1996 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.615 1.906 1996 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.952 0.456 1996 7 26.694 0.235 1 0 NaN NaN 27.394 0.275 1996 8 25.221 -0.826 0 0 25.221 -0.826 26.148 -0.559 1996 9 21.897 -1.333 0 0 21.897 -1.333 23.304 -0.586 1996 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.609 0.199 1996 11 11.733 0.451 0 0 11.733 0.451 12.304 0.361 1996 12 9.473 2.067 0 0 9.473 2.067 10.087 2.020 1997 1 6.678 0.747 0 0 6.678 0.747 6.583 -0.009 1997 2 10.648 2.682 0 0 10.648 2.682 10.199 1.572 1997 3 15.452 3.376 0 0 15.452 3.376 15.917 3.180 1997 4 14.543 -2.392 0 0 14.543 -2.392 15.387 -2.210 1997 5 19.731 -1.317 0 0 19.731 -1.317 20.446 -1.262 1997 6 23.078 -1.758 0 0 23.078 -1.758 24.835 -0.661 1997 7 26.505 0.047 1 0 NaN NaN 27.738 0.618 1997 8 25.256 -0.790 0 0 25.256 -0.790 26.194 -0.514 1997 9 19.083 -4.146 1 0 NaN NaN 25.093 1.203 1997 10 15.715 -1.035 1 0 NaN NaN 17.380 -0.031 1997 11 9.730 -1.552 0 0 9.730 -1.552 10.373 -1.570 1997 12 6.930 -0.476 0 0 6.930 -0.476 7.184 -0.883 1998 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.565 1.973 1998 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.399 0.772 1998 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.739 0.003 1998 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.031 -0.565 1998 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.342 1.634 1998 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.081 2.585 1998 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.597 1.478 1998 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.798 1.091 1998 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.021 3.131 1998 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.842 2.431 1998 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.688 2.746 1998 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.291 2.225