% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 27905 % Primary Name: SOMERTON % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: AZ % Latitude: 32.57640 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -114.64110 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 57.00 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 21 % % Alternate Names: Missing Station ID - 28070 % % IDs: coop - 28070 % ghcnd - USC00028070 % ncdc - 30015439 % nws - STNA3 % % Sources: US Cooperative Summary of the Day % Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 8fb8825805f1fa59b56ec8a092ee5b1f % Raw Data Hash: 90ba262ccbc81474472b95106d91133b % Adj Data Hash: da61d85484a1f18bac59d54318932cda % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 35.902 2.275 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 33.525 0.705 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 31.961 2.136 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.427 -0.905 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.976 1.741 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.140 -0.788 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.186 1.534 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.571 0.398 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.190 -0.487 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.311 -1.032 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.703 -1.224 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 30.329 0.380 2010 7 32.667 -0.238 0 0 32.667 -0.238 34.912 1.286 2010 8 32.500 0.402 0 0 32.500 0.402 33.370 0.550 2010 9 29.889 0.787 0 0 29.889 0.787 31.743 1.918 2010 10 23.500 0.891 0 0 23.500 0.891 23.928 0.597 2010 11 16.222 0.710 0 0 16.222 0.710 16.291 0.056 2010 12 13.944 2.739 0 0 13.944 2.739 13.961 2.034 2011 1 13.222 2.292 0 0 13.222 2.292 12.548 0.895 2011 2 11.889 -1.562 0 0 11.889 -1.562 12.295 -1.878 2011 3 17.222 1.268 0 0 17.222 1.268 18.122 1.446 2011 4 21.056 1.435 0 0 21.056 1.435 21.724 1.381 2011 5 22.444 -1.760 0 0 22.444 -1.760 23.609 -1.318 2011 6 28.389 -0.838 0 0 28.389 -0.838 30.246 0.297 2011 7 32.333 -0.571 0 0 32.333 -0.571 34.205 0.578 2011 8 33.667 1.569 0 0 33.667 1.569 35.050 2.230 2011 9 30.556 1.454 0 0 30.556 1.454 31.793 1.969 2011 10 24.389 1.780 0 0 24.389 1.780 25.026 1.695 2011 11 16.111 0.599 0 0 16.111 0.599 15.967 -0.268 2011 12 10.937 -0.268 0 0 10.937 -0.268 10.374 -1.553 2012 1 14.206 3.276 0 0 14.206 3.276 13.704 2.051 2012 2 14.262 0.811 1 0 NaN NaN 14.667 0.494 2012 3 15.900 -0.054 1 0 NaN NaN 17.070 0.394 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.022 1.678 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.210 2.283 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 31.715 1.766 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 33.538 -0.089 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 33.904 1.084 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 31.510 1.686 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.881 1.550 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.481 2.247 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.545 0.617 2013 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.918 -0.734 2013 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.125 -1.048 2013 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.613 2.937