% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 26984 % Primary Name: KINGS BAY NAVY BASE % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: GA % Latitude: 30.80000 +/- 0.00833 % Longitude: -81.50000 +/- 0.00833 % Elevation (m): 15.24 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 15 % % IDs: ghcnd - USW00053846 % ncdc - 30014223 % nws - NBQ % wban - 53846 % % Sources: Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 9b9f6e04206e7c963ade8e49d8cbb9c0 % Raw Data Hash: 4496158a0cdd322649374de5fc62aa9d % Adj Data Hash: e899d7c5f5425b46eb2e9ee8299f19cc % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 1995 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.464 0.842 1995 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.242 -0.080 1995 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.569 1.728 1995 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.100 -1.320 1995 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.453 -1.210 1996 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.795 -0.644 1996 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.119 0.003 1996 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.286 -1.975 1996 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.152 -0.692 1996 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.971 1.380 1996 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.513 0.262 1996 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.508 0.913 1996 8 26.494 -0.424 1 0 NaN NaN 26.082 -0.540 1996 9 25.490 -0.128 0 0 25.490 -0.128 25.711 0.389 1996 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.616 -0.225 1996 11 15.628 -1.086 0 0 15.628 -1.086 15.865 -0.555 1996 12 13.502 0.543 0 0 13.502 0.543 13.304 0.641 1997 1 13.109 1.374 0 0 13.109 1.374 12.218 0.780 1997 2 14.775 2.363 1 0 NaN NaN 13.796 1.680 1997 3 19.539 3.982 1 0 NaN NaN 19.276 4.015 1997 4 18.897 -0.243 0 0 18.897 -0.243 18.206 -0.638 1997 5 22.587 -0.300 0 0 22.587 -0.300 21.655 -0.936 1997 6 24.967 -0.580 0 0 24.967 -0.580 24.091 -1.159 1997 7 27.525 0.634 1 0 NaN NaN 27.145 0.549 1997 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.465 -0.157 1997 9 26.629 1.011 1 0 NaN NaN 26.180 0.858 1997 10 20.921 -0.216 0 0 20.921 -0.216 20.946 0.104 1997 11 15.352 -1.363 0 0 15.352 -1.363 15.794 -0.625 1997 12 13.398 0.439 1 0 NaN NaN 12.667 0.004 1998 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.143 1.704 1998 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.794 0.678 1998 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.421 -0.840 1998 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.226 0.382 1998 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.296 1.705 1998 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.279 3.028 1998 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.250 1.655 1998 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.228 0.605 1998 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.591 1.269 1998 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.295 1.454 1998 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.803 3.384 1998 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.753 3.090