% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 26400 % Primary Name: E CAMERON 47JP % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: LA % Latitude: 29.43300 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -92.98300 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 29.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 21 % % IDs: gsod - 720915-99999 % icao - KCMB % usaf - 720915 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 2ec0596305720d8895238292dc0f06b8 % Raw Data Hash: b4135157238832ba7f0b1b23ec3464af % Adj Data Hash: d7bdb36908dd5c25459f45116f9972d7 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.735 0.424 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.638 -1.444 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.255 -2.380 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.506 -4.369 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.874 -2.346 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.747 0.571 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.868 2.148 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.015 2.380 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.643 1.077 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.286 1.853 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.752 1.917 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.570 0.620 2010 11 18.946 0.782 0 0 18.946 0.782 17.152 0.842 2010 12 14.402 -0.533 1 0 NaN NaN 11.439 -1.643 2011 1 11.356 -2.133 0 0 11.356 -2.133 9.817 -1.818 2011 2 12.703 -2.025 1 0 NaN NaN 11.821 -1.054 2011 3 19.147 1.073 0 0 19.147 1.073 18.334 2.113 2011 4 23.404 1.373 0 0 23.404 1.373 22.342 2.166 2011 5 24.891 -0.683 0 0 24.891 -0.683 23.973 0.254 2011 6 30.480 1.990 0 0 30.480 1.990 28.984 2.349 2011 7 30.864 1.444 0 0 30.864 1.444 28.554 0.988 2011 8 31.943 2.655 0 0 31.943 2.655 29.963 2.530 2011 9 27.478 -0.212 0 0 27.478 -0.212 25.813 -0.023 2011 10 23.260 0.456 0 0 23.260 0.456 20.268 -0.682 2011 11 19.085 0.921 0 0 19.085 0.921 17.235 0.925 2011 12 14.724 -0.211 0 0 14.724 -0.211 13.447 0.366 2012 1 16.867 3.378 0 0 16.867 3.378 14.644 3.009 2012 2 15.713 0.984 1 0 NaN NaN 14.569 1.694 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.407 4.187 2012 4 24.781 2.751 1 0 NaN NaN 22.016 1.839 2012 5 27.792 2.219 0 0 27.792 2.219 25.244 1.525 2012 6 30.407 1.918 0 0 30.407 1.918 27.838 1.203 2012 7 30.561 1.142 0 0 30.561 1.142 27.933 0.367 2012 8 31.951 2.664 1 0 NaN NaN 28.090 0.656 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.677 0.841 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.941 -0.009 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.324 0.013 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.222 2.141 2013 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.950 1.315 2013 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.085 1.210 2013 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.579 -1.642 2013 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.277 -0.899 2013 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.783 -0.936 2013 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.203 1.568 2013 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.665 0.100 2013 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.005 0.572