% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 25960 % Primary Name: OKEECHOBEE INTOWN % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: FL % Latitude: 27.25560 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -80.83580 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 7.92 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 15 % % Alternate Names: Missing Station ID - 86477 % % IDs: coop - 86477 % ghcnd - USC00086477 % ncdc - 30015594 % nws - OKIF1 % % Sources: Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: e90478bc875acc4608d45607d59d814c % Raw Data Hash: 4fdcb23e41d0daf37b7c7627cc212906 % Adj Data Hash: b6d6327373b51ec4e3d1cd51c54bdddf % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.808 -3.414 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.748 -3.140 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.952 0.001 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.924 1.600 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.358 2.268 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.311 1.317 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.165 1.076 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.424 1.167 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.560 0.231 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.377 0.365 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.333 -4.792 2011 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.806 -0.732 2011 2 20.117 3.287 1 0 NaN NaN 19.431 1.209 2011 3 19.222 -0.273 0 0 19.222 -0.273 21.669 0.781 2011 4 23.222 1.663 0 0 23.222 1.663 25.349 2.398 2011 5 24.667 0.735 0 0 24.667 0.735 26.130 0.805 2011 6 26.722 1.024 0 0 26.722 1.024 27.896 0.806 2011 7 27.278 0.676 0 0 27.278 0.676 28.795 0.801 2011 8 28.056 1.359 0 0 28.056 1.359 29.046 0.957 2011 9 26.778 0.913 0 0 26.778 0.913 28.196 0.938 2011 10 23.500 0.564 0 0 23.500 0.564 24.296 -0.033 2011 11 21.222 1.603 0 0 21.222 1.603 22.375 1.363 2011 12 19.377 2.644 0 0 19.377 2.644 20.262 2.136 2012 1 16.527 0.382 1 0 NaN NaN 17.608 0.071 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.351 2.129 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.952 2.064 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.296 0.344 2012 5 25.077 1.145 0 0 25.077 1.145 26.005 0.680 2012 6 25.560 -0.138 0 0 25.560 -0.138 27.372 0.281 2012 7 27.610 1.008 1 0 NaN NaN 28.282 0.288 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.520 0.431 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.562 0.304 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.955 0.626 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.670 -1.342 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.714 1.589 2013 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.525 2.988 2013 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.190 0.967 2013 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.039 -2.848 2013 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.424 1.473 2013 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.955 -0.369 2013 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.791 0.701 2013 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.890 -0.105