% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 2547 % Primary Name: FOB BAYLOUGH % Record Type: TAVG % Country: Afghanistan % Latitude: 32.65000 +/- 0.00500 % Longitude: 66.80000 +/- 0.00500 % Elevation (m): 2222.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 24 % % IDs: gsod - 694624-99999 % icao - KQYL % usaf - 694624 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 95d5a08b438d05bb111f8f4defacf0d1 % Raw Data Hash: 98c5cb4d0130ac8f1ca9adbb410a3570 % Adj Data Hash: b66b7fbd3a469fdfdff3a24089c892a5 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2008 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.517 2.200 2008 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.205 0.229 2008 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.697 1.472 2009 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.297 1.638 2009 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.608 3.006 2009 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.029 2.703 2009 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.311 -0.730 2009 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.637 1.491 2009 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.031 -1.247 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.556 1.064 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.997 2.233 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.510 1.710 2009 10 10.978 -2.111 1 0 NaN NaN 12.740 -0.576 2009 11 8.306 1.557 0 0 8.306 1.557 7.513 0.538 2009 12 2.489 0.492 0 0 2.489 0.492 2.703 0.478 2010 1 3.706 4.275 0 0 3.706 4.275 2.985 3.326 2010 2 3.109 0.735 0 0 3.109 0.735 4.565 1.963 2010 3 12.124 4.025 0 0 12.124 4.025 12.897 4.571 2010 4 15.220 1.407 1 0 NaN NaN 17.412 3.371 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.208 2.062 2010 6 25.942 1.892 1 0 NaN NaN 25.393 1.115 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.436 0.944 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.411 0.647 2010 9 18.409 -1.164 0 0 18.409 -1.164 19.822 0.022 2010 10 17.222 4.133 0 0 17.222 4.133 16.117 2.801 2010 11 5.933 -0.815 1 0 NaN NaN 6.738 -0.238 2010 12 3.014 1.017 0 0 3.014 1.017 1.439 -0.786 2011 1 1.022 1.590 0 0 1.022 1.590 0.690 1.031 2011 2 0.090 -2.284 0 0 0.090 -2.284 2.321 -0.280 2011 3 10.620 2.522 0 0 10.620 2.522 9.793 1.467 2011 4 14.173 0.360 0 0 14.173 0.360 15.181 1.141 2011 5 22.308 3.390 0 0 22.308 3.390 22.930 3.785 2011 6 25.743 1.693 0 0 25.743 1.693 27.169 2.892 2011 7 25.912 -0.353 0 0 25.912 -0.353 27.245 0.753 2011 8 26.020 1.483 0 0 26.020 1.483 26.761 1.997 2011 9 20.918 1.345 0 0 20.918 1.345 21.484 1.684 2011 10 12.731 -0.358 1 0 NaN NaN 14.848 1.531 2011 11 9.783 3.035 0 0 9.783 3.035 9.010 2.035 2011 12 2.302 0.304 0 0 2.302 0.304 0.967 -1.259 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.092 -1.751 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.416 -3.018 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.498 0.172 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.077 1.036 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.960 0.815 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.652 0.374 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.903 1.411 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.143 1.379 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.719 0.918 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.763 0.446 2012 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.276 0.301 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.656 -0.569