% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 19145 % Primary Name: HASVIK-SLUSKFJELLET % Record Type: TAVG % Country: Norway % Latitude: 70.61700 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: 22.45000 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 438.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 16 % % IDs: gsod - 010420-99999 % usaf - 10420 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 08ab06f29653c7734353db3be423ee32 % Raw Data Hash: c316ecfba7f2914c531102c33ac507af % Adj Data Hash: 54e753f2eeaeb67d6ea7c10b8130db2a % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2007 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.700 -0.334 2007 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.504 3.862 2007 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.364 1.020 2007 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.300 5.731 2008 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -7.247 4.430 2008 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -8.103 3.393 2008 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -7.874 -0.006 2008 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.559 -0.345 2008 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.410 -0.390 2008 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.677 -0.958 2008 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.064 -0.627 2008 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.371 -1.731 2008 9 4.881 -0.474 1 0 NaN NaN 4.823 -0.211 2008 10 1.089 2.126 0 0 1.089 2.126 -0.388 0.970 2008 11 -2.896 3.166 0 0 -2.896 3.166 -5.981 0.403 2008 12 -2.022 7.689 0 0 -2.022 7.689 -5.858 4.174 2009 1 -5.246 6.110 0 0 -5.246 6.110 -8.653 3.023 2009 2 -7.461 3.715 1 0 NaN NaN -12.468 -0.971 2009 3 -4.760 2.787 0 0 -4.760 2.787 -5.831 2.037 2009 4 -3.433 -0.540 1 0 NaN NaN -2.119 1.095 2009 5 2.597 -0.525 0 0 2.597 -0.525 5.185 2.385 2009 6 3.661 -5.295 0 0 3.661 -5.295 7.662 -0.973 2009 7 9.025 -2.988 0 0 9.025 -2.988 11.564 -0.128 2009 8 10.414 -0.009 0 0 10.414 -0.009 11.314 1.212 2009 9 5.287 -0.068 0 0 5.287 -0.068 6.368 1.334 2009 10 -0.100 0.937 0 0 -0.100 0.937 -1.865 -0.507 2009 11 -0.440 5.622 1 0 NaN NaN -3.024 3.359 2009 12 -1.902 7.809 1 0 NaN NaN -10.402 -0.371 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -11.311 0.366 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -14.832 -3.335 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -9.261 -1.393 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.770 2.444 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.178 2.378 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.305 -1.330 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.059 0.367 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.901 -1.201 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.913 0.879 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.444 1.802 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -9.074 -2.691 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -10.303 -0.271