% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 172629 % Primary Name: MONTE GENEROSO % Record Type: TAVG % Country: Switzerland % Latitude: 45.92757 +/- 0.00014 % Longitude: 9.01778 +/- 0.00014 % Elevation (m): 1601.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 13 % % IDs: gsod - 067770-99999 % usaf - 67770 % wmo - 6777 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % World Meteorological Organization Metadata % % Site Hash: f8eb293b876776bdc59b80e84d263471 % Raw Data Hash: 5f3d47d4af7c7b289c32d1bf0056aa38 % Adj Data Hash: 6e50eed0bf74b7c2ba197bf9423abfbf % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2011 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.238 1.737 2011 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.590 1.632 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.642 1.619 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.908 -2.888 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.036 4.105 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.540 0.315 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.178 1.428 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.587 2.267 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.979 1.245 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.088 2.907 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.076 0.632 2012 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.801 1.230 2012 11 -2.444 -3.102 1 0 NaN NaN 4.411 1.910 2012 12 -1.624 1.261 0 0 -1.624 1.261 -1.192 -0.150 2013 1 -0.339 3.766 0 0 -0.339 3.766 -0.842 1.419 2013 2 -4.359 -1.496 0 0 -4.359 -1.496 -3.059 -2.040 2013 3 -1.280 -1.367 0 0 -1.280 -1.367 1.364 -0.566 2013 4 4.059 0.678 0 0 4.059 0.678 6.474 1.249 2013 5 6.147 -1.760 0 0 6.147 -1.760 8.495 -1.255 2013 6 11.872 0.395 0 0 11.872 0.395 13.792 0.471 2013 7 15.690 1.800 0 0 15.690 1.800 18.157 2.423 2013 8 14.552 1.214 0 0 14.552 1.214 16.756 1.575 2013 9 11.274 0.673 0 0 11.274 0.673 13.482 1.038 2013 10 6.573 0.845 0 0 6.573 0.845 9.416 1.845 2013 11 5.364 4.706 1 0 NaN NaN NaN NaN