% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 167334 % Primary Name: FORT BENNING MCKENNA % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: GA % Latitude: 32.36700 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -84.80000 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 134.10 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 15 % % IDs: gsod - 999999-03874 % icao - MKF % wban - 3874 % % Sources: US First Order Summary of the Day % Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 870d17e50110e7db348366dbc9e1bd4c % Raw Data Hash: c0ea884e1a09c637a541b4219efbbfc7 % Adj Data Hash: 16a023ff2f29e92f9bd3363af3ada183 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 1963 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.436 2.111 1963 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.418 1.361 1963 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.536 0.348 1963 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.843 0.034 1963 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.259 -1.074 1963 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.251 0.213 1963 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.060 -0.236 1963 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.897 0.899 1963 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.614 -0.068 1963 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.387 -4.390 1964 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.197 -1.399 1964 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.065 -3.220 1964 3 14.795 0.462 0 0 14.795 0.462 12.134 -0.191 1964 4 19.652 0.588 1 0 NaN NaN 17.900 0.843 1964 5 22.898 -0.296 1 0 NaN NaN 21.156 -0.031 1964 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.961 1.151 1964 7 26.669 -1.670 0 0 26.669 -1.670 25.228 -1.104 1964 8 27.032 -1.013 0 0 27.032 -1.013 25.261 -0.777 1964 9 29.167 3.864 1 0 NaN NaN 23.549 0.253 1964 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.879 -2.120 1964 11 10.099 -3.590 1 0 NaN NaN 13.622 1.941 1964 12 9.894 0.110 0 0 9.894 0.110 9.229 1.452 1965 1 9.819 1.217 0 0 9.819 1.217 7.353 0.758 1965 2 9.288 -1.004 0 0 9.288 -1.004 7.356 -0.929 1965 3 13.226 -1.107 1 0 NaN NaN 11.106 -1.220 1965 4 20.885 1.821 0 0 20.885 1.821 18.800 1.743 1965 5 25.859 2.665 0 0 25.859 2.665 22.521 1.334 1965 6 25.538 -1.278 0 0 25.538 -1.278 23.834 -0.975 1965 7 26.860 -1.480 1 0 NaN NaN 25.611 -0.722 1965 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.747 -0.291 1965 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.871 0.575 1965 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.182 -0.817 1965 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.707 2.025 1965 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.094 0.317 1966 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.340 -2.255 1966 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.267 -1.018 1966 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.410 -0.915 1966 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.435 0.378 1966 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.439 -0.748 1966 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.332 -1.477 1966 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.953 0.621