% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 164335 % Primary Name: NEW HAMPTON 2 % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: NH % Latitude: 43.60560 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -71.65610 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 170.69 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 18 % % Alternate Names: Missing Station ID - 270610 % % IDs: coop - 270610 % ghcnd - USC00270610 % ncdc - 30015071 % nws - NHPN3 % % Sources: Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % US Cooperative Summary of the Month % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 6b1f6089349cd5c460c63c9f033f1d4e % Raw Data Hash: 9c3d2fca1fcff673b3580fff54e906d3 % Adj Data Hash: e70ae9c46e01b69d67fc7084ebf6e901 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.534 0.158 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.085 2.181 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.517 0.875 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.986 1.769 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.225 0.051 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.372 1.261 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -6.359 0.169 2011 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -8.954 0.254 2011 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -8.576 -0.374 2011 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.340 0.134 2011 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.831 0.646 2011 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.033 1.898 2011 6 17.889 0.070 1 0 NaN NaN 16.403 0.028 2011 7 21.769 1.422 0 0 21.769 1.422 20.315 1.411 2011 8 20.148 1.063 0 0 20.148 1.063 18.695 1.053 2011 9 16.975 2.314 0 0 16.975 2.314 15.557 2.340 2011 10 9.866 1.249 0 0 9.866 1.249 8.574 1.401 2011 11 3.430 0.875 0 0 3.430 0.875 4.818 3.707 2011 12 -1.156 3.928 0 0 -1.156 3.928 -3.242 3.286 2012 1 -4.503 3.261 0 0 -4.503 3.261 -6.580 2.628 2012 2 -3.134 3.624 1 0 NaN NaN -4.540 3.662 2012 3 4.624 5.654 0 0 4.624 5.654 2.917 5.390 2012 4 8.685 3.056 0 0 8.685 3.056 6.214 2.029 2012 5 14.800 2.221 0 0 14.800 2.221 13.600 2.464 2012 6 17.772 -0.047 0 0 17.772 -0.047 16.512 0.136 2012 7 21.737 1.390 0 0 21.737 1.390 20.100 1.197 2012 8 20.963 1.878 0 0 20.963 1.878 19.694 2.052 2012 9 15.323 0.663 0 0 15.323 0.663 13.510 0.293 2012 10 10.994 2.377 0 0 10.994 2.377 9.469 2.295 2012 11 3.178 0.624 0 0 3.178 0.624 1.356 0.245 2012 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.411 3.118 2013 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -7.863 1.345 2013 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -6.353 1.849 2013 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.099 1.375 2013 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.595 0.409 2013 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.373 1.238 2013 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.814 0.439 2013 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.956 2.052 2013 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.930 0.289 2013 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.526 0.309 2013 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.335 1.162