% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 163422 % Primary Name: EDEN 2N % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: UT % Latitude: 41.32940 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -111.82360 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 1626.72 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 29 % % IDs: coop - 422389 % ghcnd - USC00422389 % ncdc - 30015127 % nws - EDEU1 % % Sources: Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 31d5a7c4adff1c744573f79ef32719ba % Raw Data Hash: ee84aa501c9f7311ea7888a7feb09d37 % Adj Data Hash: bbe67ead471c3e528c654f3c5d1d5369 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.836 2.492 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.472 -0.020 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.685 0.807 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.861 -0.582 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.044 -3.015 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.251 -0.396 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.453 0.595 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.518 -0.191 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.689 1.445 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.257 1.867 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.443 -0.800 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.068 2.064 2011 1 -5.900 -0.930 0 0 -5.900 -0.930 -6.451 0.878 2011 2 -4.063 -0.968 0 0 -4.063 -0.968 -6.570 -1.118 2011 3 1.415 1.549 0 0 1.415 1.549 -2.030 0.463 2011 4 3.613 -1.187 0 0 3.613 -1.187 0.600 -1.842 2011 5 8.106 -2.311 0 0 8.106 -2.311 5.437 -2.622 2011 6 14.437 -0.569 0 0 14.437 -0.569 11.181 -1.467 2011 7 20.123 0.906 0 0 20.123 0.906 17.201 0.342 2011 8 20.274 2.208 0 0 20.274 2.208 17.149 1.441 2011 9 15.313 1.711 0 0 15.313 1.711 12.472 1.227 2011 10 8.302 0.554 0 0 8.302 0.554 6.467 1.077 2011 11 0.145 -0.570 0 0 0.145 -0.570 -2.227 -0.583 2011 12 -4.758 -0.985 0 0 -4.758 -0.985 -6.214 -0.083 2012 1 -3.558 1.412 0 0 -3.558 1.412 -4.058 3.270 2012 2 -2.274 0.820 1 0 NaN NaN -5.047 0.405 2012 3 4.194 4.328 0 0 4.194 4.328 1.209 3.702 2012 4 7.697 2.896 0 0 7.697 2.896 4.634 2.191 2012 5 11.082 0.665 0 0 11.082 0.665 9.065 1.006 2012 6 16.910 1.904 0 0 16.910 1.904 14.280 1.632 2012 7 21.074 1.858 0 0 21.074 1.858 18.441 1.583 2012 8 20.831 2.764 0 0 20.831 2.764 17.871 2.162 2012 9 15.068 1.466 0 0 15.068 1.466 12.913 1.669 2012 10 7.324 -0.424 0 0 7.324 -0.424 6.431 1.041 2012 11 3.215 2.500 0 0 3.215 2.500 1.565 3.208 2012 12 -3.469 0.304 0 0 -3.469 0.304 -6.035 0.096 2013 1 -8.665 -3.694 0 0 -8.665 -3.694 -7.843 -0.515 2013 2 -3.955 -0.861 0 0 -3.955 -0.861 -6.233 -0.781 2013 3 3.010 3.144 0 0 3.010 3.144 -0.961 1.532 2013 4 5.000 0.199 0 0 5.000 0.199 1.194 -1.249 2013 5 11.540 1.123 0 0 11.540 1.123 8.795 0.736 2013 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.436 1.788 2013 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.891 2.032 2013 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.943 1.234 2013 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.761 0.516 2013 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.880 -0.510