% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 161902 % Primary Name: DULCE 1 NW % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: NM % Latitude: 36.93500 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -107.00000 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 2074.47 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 21 % % IDs: coop - 292610 % gsod - 999999-03075 % icao - 039C % ncdc - 30015434 % nws - DBFN5 % wban - 3075 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: ac481d34d8c8d167ebcf71982ee61cd8 % Raw Data Hash: 2951c128db3f7559b44f0ad14f2fe25b % Adj Data Hash: d463f8615a3e0024037d64218ace7b01 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2008 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.784 0.016 2008 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.965 0.580 2008 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.692 0.345 2008 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.695 0.575 2008 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.774 1.688 2008 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.215 0.762 2009 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.880 2.011 2009 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.704 1.923 2009 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 3.799 1.368 2009 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 6.649 -0.304 2009 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.131 2.042 2009 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.410 -1.063 2009 7 20.260 1.692 1 0 NaN NaN 21.862 1.093 2009 8 17.538 0.354 0 0 17.538 0.354 19.649 0.264 2009 9 13.031 -0.114 0 0 13.031 -0.114 15.464 0.117 2009 10 5.231 -1.687 0 0 5.231 -1.687 7.928 -1.192 2009 11 0.898 1.014 0 0 0.898 1.014 3.769 1.683 2009 12 -8.801 -3.623 0 0 -8.801 -3.623 -4.985 -2.008 2010 1 -11.766 -5.674 1 0 NaN NaN -4.082 -0.191 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.327 -1.109 2010 3 0.341 0.112 0 0 0.341 0.112 1.762 -0.668 2010 4 6.643 1.890 0 0 6.643 1.890 7.415 0.462 2010 5 10.839 0.951 0 0 10.839 0.951 11.379 -0.711 2010 6 17.063 1.791 0 0 17.063 1.791 18.980 1.507 2010 7 19.962 1.395 0 0 19.962 1.395 21.802 1.033 2010 8 17.776 0.592 0 0 17.776 0.592 19.519 0.134 2010 9 14.444 1.299 0 0 14.444 1.299 17.405 2.059 2010 10 8.561 1.643 0 0 8.561 1.643 10.790 1.671 2010 11 -1.106 -0.990 0 0 -1.106 -0.990 1.434 -0.651 2010 12 -1.507 3.670 0 0 -1.507 3.670 0.834 3.811 2011 1 -8.084 -1.992 0 0 -8.084 -1.992 -4.389 -0.499 2011 2 -4.018 -0.598 0 0 -4.018 -0.598 -2.526 -1.308 2011 3 2.812 2.583 1 0 NaN NaN 4.589 2.159 2011 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.837 0.883 2011 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.625 -1.464 2011 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.669 1.196 2011 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.121 1.352 2011 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.419 2.034 2011 9 27.524 14.378 1 0 NaN NaN 16.050 0.703 2011 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.345 0.226 2011 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.508 0.422 2011 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -3.936 -0.960 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -1.492 2.399 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.969 0.250 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.046 1.615 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.299 2.346 2012 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.748 1.659 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.269 2.796 2012 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.421 0.652 2012 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.794 1.409 2012 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.671 1.325