% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 161597 % Primary Name: B EVERETT JORDAN DAM % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: NC % Latitude: 35.65420 +/- 0.00005 % Longitude: -79.07060 +/- 0.00005 % Elevation (m): 94.49 +/- 0.15 % # of Months: 28 % % IDs: coop - 310750 % ghcnd - USC00310750 % ncdc - 20013831 % nws - NHPN7 % % Sources: Global Historical Climatology Network - Daily % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 0c5e82e5a36034dab5899fb446fa758a % Raw Data Hash: ff5f1ef89bb6a676489a986609673e13 % Adj Data Hash: 2d6562db3c122291c2362d0c0a812c18 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.975 -1.413 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.714 -3.009 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.326 1.082 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.177 2.423 2010 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.150 1.860 2010 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.201 3.151 2010 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.791 1.604 2010 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.367 1.692 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.638 2.413 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.943 1.192 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.109 0.602 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.726 -3.955 2011 1 2.121 -1.349 1 0 NaN NaN 1.944 -1.444 2011 2 7.213 2.408 0 0 7.213 2.408 6.566 1.843 2011 3 10.998 1.671 1 0 NaN NaN 10.113 0.869 2011 4 16.543 1.706 1 0 NaN NaN 16.988 2.234 2011 5 20.523 1.151 1 0 NaN NaN 20.007 0.717 2011 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 25.244 2.194 2011 7 27.742 2.473 0 0 27.742 2.473 27.300 2.113 2011 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.086 1.411 2011 9 22.819 1.512 0 0 22.819 1.512 22.266 1.042 2011 10 15.046 0.213 1 0 NaN NaN 14.222 -0.529 2011 11 10.989 1.400 1 0 NaN NaN 11.690 2.184 2011 12 9.310 4.546 1 0 NaN NaN 7.666 2.986 2012 1 7.034 3.564 1 0 NaN NaN 5.752 2.364 2012 2 8.197 3.391 1 0 NaN NaN 6.576 1.852 2012 3 15.481 6.154 1 0 NaN NaN 14.787 5.542 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.395 0.641 2012 5 21.262 1.890 0 0 21.262 1.890 21.288 1.999 2012 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.785 -0.266 2012 7 27.413 2.144 1 0 NaN NaN 27.425 2.238 2012 8 24.297 -0.461 1 0 NaN NaN 24.833 0.158 2012 9 20.852 -0.455 0 0 20.852 -0.455 21.376 0.151 2012 10 15.326 0.492 1 0 NaN NaN 14.791 0.039 2012 11 7.289 -2.300 1 0 NaN NaN 8.173 -1.334 2012 12 9.105 4.342 1 0 NaN NaN 8.069 3.388 2013 1 6.493 3.023 1 0 NaN NaN 5.697 2.309 2013 2 6.026 1.221 0 0 6.026 1.221 4.141 -0.583 2013 3 6.708 -2.619 1 0 NaN NaN 6.572 -2.673 2013 4 15.254 0.417 0 0 15.254 0.417 15.667 0.912 2013 5 18.391 -0.980 0 0 18.391 -0.980 18.476 -0.814 2013 6 23.186 0.053 0 0 23.186 0.053 23.701 0.651 2013 7 24.803 -0.466 0 0 24.803 -0.466 25.472 0.285 2013 8 23.490 -1.268 0 0 23.490 -1.268 23.881 -0.794 2013 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.242 0.018 2013 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.716 0.964