% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 160648 % Primary Name: TEMPLE DRAUGHTON MIL % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: TX % Latitude: 31.15000 +/- 0.00833 % Longitude: -97.41667 +/- 0.00833 % Elevation (m): 207.90 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 12 % % Alternate Names: Missing Station ID - 999999-93984 % % IDs: faa - TPL % gsod - 999999-93984 % icao - KTPL % ncdc - 20024951 % wban - 93984 % % Sources: US First Order Summary of the Day % Global Summary of the Day % Multi-network Metadata System % % Site Hash: 9c9833d7b992a9efe71504124aa4d604 % Raw Data Hash: 0ecde5b6c5faaf6efa8fc54c04545f1b % Adj Data Hash: fd344a9af4531eac80a59577205bfe10 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2004 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.789 2.217 2004 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.979 -1.888 2004 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.666 2.600 2004 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.568 -0.272 2004 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.930 0.282 2004 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.204 -0.512 2004 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.654 -1.093 2004 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.203 -1.303 2004 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.996 -0.144 2004 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.450 2.991 2004 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.171 0.963 2004 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.432 0.149 2005 1 10.661 3.043 0 0 10.661 3.043 10.334 2.762 2005 2 12.446 2.534 1 0 NaN NaN 10.883 1.016 2005 3 14.254 0.143 0 0 14.254 0.143 13.691 -0.375 2005 4 18.552 -0.334 0 0 18.552 -0.334 18.727 -0.112 2005 5 22.547 -0.147 0 0 22.547 -0.147 22.090 -0.558 2005 6 27.456 0.694 1 0 NaN NaN 27.674 0.958 2005 7 28.332 -0.461 0 0 28.332 -0.461 28.714 -0.032 2005 8 27.683 -0.870 0 0 27.683 -0.870 28.276 -0.230 2005 9 27.546 2.360 0 0 27.546 2.360 27.678 2.537 2005 10 19.878 0.373 0 0 19.878 0.373 19.881 0.422 2005 11 16.285 3.031 0 0 16.285 3.031 15.904 2.696 2005 12 9.079 -0.250 0 0 9.079 -0.250 9.063 -0.221 2006 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.212 4.640 2006 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.836 -0.031 2006 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.369 2.303 2006 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.125 3.285 2006 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.832 1.184 2006 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.453 0.737 2006 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.184 0.438 2006 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 30.614 2.108 2006 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.976 -0.164 2006 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.321 0.862 2006 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.843 1.635 2006 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.344 1.060