% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 157230 % Primary Name: FOLLDAL-FREDHEIM % Record Type: TAVG % Country: Norway % Latitude: 62.13071 +/- 0.00279 % Longitude: 9.99754 +/- 0.00296 % Elevation (m): 694.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 27 % % IDs: gsod - 012500-99999 % usaf - 12500 % wmo - 1250 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % World Meteorological Organization Metadata % % Site Hash: 43cdceec94cfb0a5014467f7cfa0374f % Raw Data Hash: 42a7c023a43750e5f9e458fff7b106d5 % Adj Data Hash: 6c28d961ba6a5485256e49fb32f7f3bf % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2010 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.245 -0.171 2010 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 0.020 0.439 2010 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -10.285 -4.457 2010 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -14.702 -5.547 2011 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -9.096 1.974 2011 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -11.260 -0.606 2011 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -5.722 0.965 2011 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 2.086 4.440 2011 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 4.596 1.095 2011 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.841 0.950 2011 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 10.487 1.053 2011 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.474 0.751 2011 9 13.132 8.378 1 0 NaN NaN 6.118 1.702 2011 10 1.896 1.977 0 0 1.896 1.977 1.414 1.832 2011 11 -2.139 3.352 0 0 -2.139 3.352 -1.093 4.735 2011 12 -8.360 0.458 0 0 -8.360 0.458 -6.517 2.638 2012 1 -13.824 -3.092 0 0 -13.824 -3.092 -9.594 1.476 2012 2 -8.755 1.562 0 0 -8.755 1.562 -8.670 1.984 2012 3 0.927 7.276 0 0 0.927 7.276 -1.528 5.159 2012 4 -0.980 1.037 0 0 -0.980 1.037 -3.052 -0.698 2012 5 4.968 1.129 0 0 4.968 1.129 3.617 0.116 2012 6 7.965 -0.263 0 0 7.965 -0.263 6.545 -1.346 2012 7 11.099 1.327 0 0 11.099 1.327 8.707 -0.727 2012 8 10.473 1.413 0 0 10.473 1.413 9.064 0.342 2012 9 5.122 0.369 0 0 5.122 0.369 3.301 -1.116 2012 10 -1.866 -1.785 0 0 -1.866 -1.785 -1.791 -1.373 2012 11 -3.163 2.328 0 0 -3.163 2.328 -3.318 2.510 2012 12 -15.787 -6.969 0 0 -15.787 -6.969 -12.161 -3.005 2013 1 -17.631 -6.898 0 0 -17.631 -6.898 -12.182 -1.112 2013 2 -11.105 -0.788 1 0 NaN NaN -11.122 -0.468 2013 3 -10.734 -4.384 0 0 -10.734 -4.384 -9.729 -3.042 2013 4 -1.954 0.063 0 0 -1.954 0.063 -3.070 -0.717 2013 5 8.032 4.194 0 0 8.032 4.194 5.758 2.257 2013 6 10.059 1.831 0 0 10.059 1.831 8.034 0.143 2013 7 13.057 3.286 0 0 13.057 3.286 10.468 1.034 2013 8 11.004 1.943 0 0 11.004 1.943 9.076 0.353 2013 9 6.902 2.148 0 0 6.902 2.148 5.180 0.764 2013 10 1.493 1.574 0 0 1.493 1.574 1.248 1.666 2013 11 -3.260 2.231 1 0 NaN NaN NaN NaN