% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 149505 % Primary Name: JULIET (POWER) % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: MT % Latitude: 47.75000 +/- 0.00500 % Longitude: -111.55000 +/- 0.00500 % Elevation (m): 1152.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 16 % % IDs: gsod - 721004-99999 % icao - K1JM % usaf - 721004 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 22ad20bc9200139b7ff12d43a0ad5877 % Raw Data Hash: 985119409f6e1bb6d19aad30d8bb22b4 % Adj Data Hash: 37ed8f9018e7f86791b356a26a891275 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2011 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.803 -1.221 2011 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 11.274 -1.982 2011 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.356 0.230 2011 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.198 1.886 2011 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.073 2.700 2011 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 7.802 1.565 2011 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -0.823 -0.111 2011 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.050 2.584 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -4.404 3.260 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN -2.197 1.637 2012 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.530 3.289 2012 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 5.872 2.315 2012 5 10.958 1.614 1 0 NaN NaN 8.563 -0.461 2012 6 14.863 1.287 0 0 14.863 1.287 12.973 -0.283 2012 7 21.360 3.913 0 0 21.360 3.913 19.733 2.607 2012 8 20.873 4.240 1 0 NaN NaN 17.870 1.558 2012 9 14.600 2.905 1 0 NaN NaN 13.695 2.321 2012 10 4.457 -2.100 0 0 4.457 -2.100 5.641 -0.596 2012 11 1.002 1.394 0 0 1.002 1.394 1.375 2.087 2012 12 -9.656 -5.343 1 0 NaN NaN -4.211 0.422 2013 1 -4.264 3.079 1 0 NaN NaN -4.191 3.472 2013 2 -1.417 2.097 0 0 -1.417 2.097 -0.348 3.486 2013 3 -0.285 1.154 0 0 -0.285 1.154 -0.426 1.333 2013 4 2.900 -0.978 0 0 2.900 -0.978 2.126 -1.431 2013 5 10.689 1.344 0 0 10.689 1.344 9.931 0.907 2013 6 13.088 -0.489 1 0 NaN NaN 13.166 -0.090 2013 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.241 2.115 2013 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.459 2.147 2013 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.458 2.084 2013 10 2.849 -3.708 1 0 NaN NaN 5.595 -0.642 2013 11 0.350 0.742 1 0 NaN NaN NaN NaN