% This file contains a station summary listing for a temperature % station in the Berkeley Earth database. This station is identified as: % % Berkeley ID#: 143411 % Primary Name: NORTHWEST FLORIDA BEACHES INT % Record Type: TAVG % Country: United States % State: FL % Latitude: 30.34900 +/- 0.00050 % Longitude: -85.78800 +/- 0.00050 % Elevation (m): 21.00 +/- 0.05 % # of Months: 10 % % IDs: gsod - 999999-73805 % icao - KECP % wban - 73805 % % Sources: Global Summary of the Day % % Site Hash: 427ceb424d43a596ea29deb0babde90e % Raw Data Hash: 23a0798c41928c8960ebc23d5fd79c84 % Adj Data Hash: 6128dfae1a5c32fb49ce9e4db46d0835 % % The data for this station is presented below in several columns and in % several forms. The temperature values are reported as "raw", % "adjusted", and "regional expectation". % % The "raw" values reflect the observations as originally ingested by % the Berkeley Earth system from one or more originating archive(s). % These "raw" values may reflect the merger of more than one temperature % time series if multiple archives reported values for this location. % Alongside the raw data we have also provided a flag indicating which % values failed initial quality control checks. A further column % dates at which the raw data may be subject to continuity "breaks" % due to documented station moves (denoted "1"), prolonged measurement % gaps (denoted "2"), documented time of observation changes (denoted "3") % and other empirically determined inhomogeneities (denoted "4"). % % In many cases, raw temperature data contains a number of artifacts, % caused by issues such as typographical errors, instrumentation changes, % station moves, and urban or agricultural development near the station. % The Berkeley Earth analysis process attempts to identify and estimate % the impact of various kinds of data quality problems by comparing each % time series to neighboring series. At the end of the analysis process, % the "adjusted" data is created as an estimate of what the weather at % this location might have looked like after removing apparent biases. % This "adjusted" data will generally to be free from quality control % issues and be regionally homogeneous. Some users may find this % "adjusted" data that attempts to remove apparent biases more % suitable for their needs, while other users may prefer to work % with raw values. % % Lastly, we have provided a "regional expectation" time series, based % on the Berkeley Earth expected temperatures in the neighborhood of the % station. This incorporates information from as many weather stations as % are available for the local region surrounding this location. Note % that the regional expectation may be a systematically a bit warmer or % colder than the weather stations by a few degrees due to differences % in mean elevation and other local characteristics. % % For each temperature time series, we have also included an "anomaly" % time series that removes both the seasonality and the long-term mean. % These anomalies may provide an easier way of seeing changes through % time. % % Reported temperatures are in Celsius and reflect monthly averages. As % these files are intended to be summaries for convenience, additional % information, including more detailed flagging and metadata, may be % available in our whole data set files. % % The Berkeley Earth analysis was run on 15-Nov-2013 19:55:48 % % Raw Data QC Continuity Adjusted Data Regional Expectation % Year, Month, Temperature, Anomaly, Failed, Breaks, Temperature, Anomaly, Temperature, Anomaly 2009 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 24.214 0.894 2009 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.161 1.983 2009 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.503 0.357 2009 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.386 0.178 2009 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 27.225 1.207 2009 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 22.777 1.653 2009 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 16.853 0.474 2009 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 12.988 -0.014 2010 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 9.299 -2.644 2010 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 8.663 -4.197 2010 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.982 -2.106 2010 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 20.014 0.412 2010 5 27.032 4.996 1 0 NaN NaN 25.173 1.852 2010 6 27.796 2.902 0 0 27.796 2.902 28.592 2.414 2010 7 28.122 2.260 0 0 28.122 2.260 28.763 1.617 2010 8 27.916 1.992 0 0 27.916 1.992 28.982 1.774 2010 9 26.109 1.375 0 0 26.109 1.375 27.808 1.790 2010 10 19.955 0.115 0 0 19.955 0.115 21.485 0.361 2010 11 15.244 0.150 0 0 15.244 0.150 17.034 0.656 2010 12 7.534 -4.184 0 0 7.534 -4.184 9.079 -3.923 2011 1 8.339 -2.321 0 0 8.339 -2.321 9.543 -2.401 2011 2 12.707 1.130 1 0 NaN NaN 13.246 0.386 2011 3 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 18.068 1.980 2011 4 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 21.326 1.724 2011 5 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 23.565 0.244 2011 6 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.531 2.353 2011 7 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 28.344 1.198 2011 8 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 29.153 1.945 2011 9 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 26.401 0.384 2011 10 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 19.999 -1.126 2011 11 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 17.344 0.966 2011 12 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 15.218 2.216 2012 1 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 13.745 1.801 2012 2 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 14.754 1.894